<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hockey Showdown &#8211; EA v. 2K: Round One</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftstickright.com/index.php/2008/08/15/ea-v-2k-round-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftstickright.com/index.php/2008/08/15/ea-v-2k-round-one/</link>
	<description>Go Forward</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 11:41:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howlett</title>
		<link>http://www.leftstickright.com/index.php/2008/08/15/ea-v-2k-round-one/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Howlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 02:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ugtv.ca/?p=107#comment-39</guid>
		<description>I think that there was a few points in the last five years in which the 2K series was better than EA&#039;s just because the mechanics were a bit tighter, the game didn&#039;t carry as many bugs in their releases, and they weren&#039;t as feature heavy, but contained a lot of what was needed to just make a solid hockey game.

Last year was the first year where I noticed most people made the definite decision to go with EA, so it&#039;ll be interesting to see what each company does different this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that there was a few points in the last five years in which the 2K series was better than EA&#8217;s just because the mechanics were a bit tighter, the game didn&#8217;t carry as many bugs in their releases, and they weren&#8217;t as feature heavy, but contained a lot of what was needed to just make a solid hockey game.</p>
<p>Last year was the first year where I noticed most people made the definite decision to go with EA, so it&#8217;ll be interesting to see what each company does different this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.leftstickright.com/index.php/2008/08/15/ea-v-2k-round-one/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 23:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ugtv.ca/?p=107#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Success, free comments.

Anyway, the 2K series is the equivalent to digital diarhea placed inside of fancy little plastic boxes.

MLB 2k8 was so awful I wanted to call Take Two and have them reimburse me for the bandwidth it took to download.

If EA shipped NHL97 inside of the 09 box, it would still be better than any shit 2K series provided.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Success, free comments.</p>
<p>Anyway, the 2K series is the equivalent to digital diarhea placed inside of fancy little plastic boxes.</p>
<p>MLB 2k8 was so awful I wanted to call Take Two and have them reimburse me for the bandwidth it took to download.</p>
<p>If EA shipped NHL97 inside of the 09 box, it would still be better than any shit 2K series provided.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

